This search combines search strings from the content search (i.e. "Full Text", "Author", "Title", "Abstract", or "Keywords") with "Article Type" and "Publication Date Range" using the AND operator.
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2017, 8, 789–800, doi:10.3762/bjnano.8.82
Figure 1: Chemical structures of type I–IV complexes.
Figure 2: Expected J couplings between the central and terminal paramagnetic metal ions in type III/IV comple...
Scheme 1: Synthesis of the heterotrinuclear CuIINiIICuII type IV complexes 1–3.
Figure 3: ORTEP diagrams (50% ellipsoid probability) of the molecular structures of 1A (top), 2A (middle) and ...
Figure 4: Magnetization versus magnetic field M(H) of 1 at T = 1.8 K (symbols) together with the fit of M(H) ...
Figure 5: Magnetization versus magnetic field M(H) of 2 at T = 1.8 K (symbols) together with the fit of M(H) ...
Figure 6: Magnetization versus magnetic field M(H) of 3 at T = 1.8 K (symbols) together with the fit of M(H) ...
Figure 7: Temperature dependence of the magnetic susceptibility χ = M/H and of the corresponding inverse susc...
Figure 8: Temperature dependence of the magnetic susceptibility χ = M/H and of the corresponding inverse susc...
Figure 9: Temperature dependence of the magnetic susceptibility χ = M/H and of the corresponding inverse susc...
Figure 10: Main panel: Difference between the calculated and measured static susceptibility for 3. Inset: Temp...